首页 / 数据库 / MySQL / MySQL关于exists的一个bug
今天碰到一个很奇怪的问题,关于exists的,第一个语句如下:SELECTcount(1)FROMAPPLY tWHEREEXISTS (SELECTr.APPLY_IDFROMRECORD rWHEREt.APPLY_ID = r.APPLY_ID);产生的结果是:89584第二个语句如下:SELECTcount(1)FROMAPPLY tWHEREEXISTS (SELECTmax(r.FINISH_TIME)FROMRECORD rWHEREt.APPLY_ID = r.APPLY_ID);产生的结果是:432382确实相当奇怪,对于exist子句来说,其判断的是子查询的值是否存在,也就是说,列名,和对列名求最大值没什么区别啊。包括MySQL官方文档中也提到Traditionally, an EXISTS subquery starts with SELECT *, but it could begin with SELECT 5 or SELECT column1 or anything at all. MySQL ignores the SELECT list in such a subquery, so it makes no difference.大意就是MySQL会自动忽略到SELECT的列表。后来在自己的环境测试了一下,确实是MySQL的一个bug测试环境:MySQL 5.6.31,5.7.14 mysql> create table t3(id int,t datetime);Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.44 sec)mysql> insert into t3 values(1,"20160812");Query OK, 1 row affected (0.16 sec)mysql> select 1 from dual whereexists (select id from t3 where id=2);Empty set (0.15 sec)mysql> select 1 from dual whereexists (select max(id) from t3 where id=2);+---+| 1 |+---+| 1 |很明显,id等于2的列不存在,但是第二条语句还是当做TRUE来处理了。也确认了下两条语句的执行计划和改写后的SQL第一个语句mysql> EXPLAIN EXTENDED select 1 from dual whereexists (select id from t3 where id=2);+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+------------------+| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key| key_len | ref| rows | filtered | Extra|+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+------------------+|1 | PRIMARY | NULL| NULL | NULL | NULL| NULL | NULL| NULL | NULL | NULL | Impossible WHERE ||2 | SUBQUERY| t3| NULL | ALL| NULL| NULL | NULL| NULL |1 | 100.00 | Using where|+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+------------------+2 rows in set, 2 warnings (0.00 sec)mysql> show warnings;+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+| Level | Code | Message |+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+| Warning | 1681 | "EXTENDED" is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. || Note| 1003 | /* select#1 */ select 1 AS `1` from DUALwhere 0 |+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+ 第二个语句mysql> EXPLAIN EXTENDED select 1 from dual whereexists (select max(id) from t3 where id=2);+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+----------------+| id | select_type | table | partitions | type | possible_keys | key| key_len | ref| rows | filtered | Extra|+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+----------------+|1 | PRIMARY | NULL| NULL | NULL | NULL| NULL | NULL| NULL | NULL | NULL | No tables used ||2 | SUBQUERY| t3| NULL | ALL| NULL| NULL | NULL| NULL |1 | 100.00 | Using where|+----+-------------+-------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+------+----------+----------------+2 rows in set, 2 warnings (0.00 sec)mysql> show warnings;+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+| Level | Code | Message |+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+| Warning | 1681 | "EXTENDED" is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. || Note| 1003 | /* select#1 */ select 1 AS `1` from DUALwhere 1 |+---------+------+-------------------------------------------------------------------+2 rows in set (0.00 sec) 执行计划及改写后的SQL确实有所不同,看来,确实是MySQL的一个bug了。于是,给官方提了个bughttp://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=82562总结建议写exists语句时,子查询中直接用*,而不用对列进行任何函数操作,避免碰到官方bug,事实上,对于abs,floor函数又没问题mysql> select 1 from dual whereexists (select abs(id) from t3 where id=2);Empty set (0.07 sec)mysql> select 1 from dual whereexists (select floor(id) from t3 where id=2);Empty set (0.00 sec)后续这个确实不是一个bug,这个是符合SQL标准的。可以参考官方的回复http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=82562本文永久更新链接地址