工作中往往会观察到索引重建带来的空间释放和应用性能提升。空间释放比较容易理解,也非常容易度量,那么索引重建到底会对应用的性能有多少影响那?首先我们会问:索引重建为什么会带来性能的提升?毫无疑问,这是因为索引重建后,与索引有关的io操作得到了降低。那么,索引io的降低在多大程度上影响了应用语句的执行效率?这恐怕需要具体问题具体分析了。首先,我们来看一下多数情况下,索引重建的效果如何SQL> create table t1 as select rownum rn,dbms_random.string("u",20) name1,dbms_random.string("u",15) name2 from dual connect by level < 1000000;表已创建。SQL> create index i1 on t1(rn);索引已创建。SQL> analyze index i1 validate structure;索引已分析SQL> select height,lf_rows,del_lf_rows,lf_blks,del_lf_rows btree_space,used_space,pct_used from index_stats; HEIGHT LF_ROWS DEL_LF_ROWS LF_BLKS BTREE_SPACE USED_SPACE PCT_USED
---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
3 999999 0 2226 0 16006445 90SQL> delete from t1 where mod(rn,2) =1;已删除500000行。SQL> commit;提交完成。SQL> analyze index i1 validate structure;索引已分析SQL> select height,lf_rows,del_lf_rows,lf_blks,del_lf_rows btree_space,used_space,pct_used from index_stats; HEIGHT LF_ROWS DEL_LF_ROWS LF_BLKS BTREE_SPACE USED_SPACE PCT_USED
---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
3 943027 443028 2226 443028 15094893 85SQL> set timing on
SQL> set autotrace on
SQL> select * from t1 where rn=1;未选定行已用时间: 00: 00: 00.00执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1704772559------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4017 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1 | 4017 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("RN"=1)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 3 consistent gets
-- 3 physical reads
0 redo size
465 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
508 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processedSQL> select * from t1 where rn=100; RN
----------
NAME1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100
IWKRROMDHLNJMXVQYRHE
VPTNTMMUJYJJQCM
已用时间: 00: 00: 00.00执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1704772559------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("RN"=100)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 5 consistent gets
-- 1 physical reads
0 redo size
696 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
519 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedSQL> select * from t1 where rn=1000; RN
----------
NAME1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1000
YTGFFEROGABGKFKQENMW
LBERYHDTRMAWGHV
已用时间: 00: 00: 00.01执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1704772559------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("RN"=1000)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 5 consistent gets
-- 4 physical reads
0 redo size
696 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
519 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedSQL> alter index i1 rebuild online;索引已更改。已用时间: 00: 00: 05.41
SQL> analyze index i1 validate structure;索引已分析已用时间: 00: 00: 00.22
SQL> select height,lf_rows,del_lf_rows,lf_blks,del_lf_rows btree_space,used_space,pct_used from index_stats; HEIGHT LF_ROWS DEL_LF_ROWS LF_BLKS BTREE_SPACE USED_SPACE PCT_USED
---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ----------
3 499999 0 1113 0 7998149 90已用时间: 00: 00: 00.03
SQL> select * from t1 where rn=1;未选定行已用时间: 00: 00: 00.00执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1704772559------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4017 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1 | 4017 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("RN"=1)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 3 consistent gets
-- 3 physical reads
0 redo size
465 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
508 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
0 rows processedSQL> select * from t1 where rn=100; RN
----------
NAME1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
100
IWKRROMDHLNJMXVQYRHE
VPTNTMMUJYJJQCM
已用时间: 00: 00: 00.00执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1704772559------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 1 | 4017 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 1 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 2 - access("RN"=100)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 5 consistent gets
-- 4 physical reads
0 redo size
696 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
519 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processedSQL> select count(name1) from t1 where rn<100;COUNT(NAME1)
------------
49已用时间: 00: 00: 00.00执行计划
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 3625400295-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2015 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 2015 | | |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T1 | 49 | 98735 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I1 | 49 | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
--------------------------------------------------- 3 - access("RN"<100)Note
-----
- dynamic sampling used for this statement (level=2)
统计信息
----------------------------------------------------------
0 recursive calls
0 db block gets
-- 4 consistent gets --
-- 4 physical reads --
0 redo size
531 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
519 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
2 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
1 rows processed
更多详情见请继续阅读下一页的精彩内容: http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2013-11/93063p2.htm
相关阅读:由Oracle索引来理解ArcSDE索引 http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2012-10/72184.htmOracle索引技术之如何建立最佳索引 http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2012-09/70996.htmOracle索引列NULL值引发执行计划该表的测试示例 http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2012-09/69938.htmOracle索引 主键影响查询速度 http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2011-12/48588.htmOracle索引扫描 http://www.linuxidc.com/Linux/2012-03/56644.htm
Oracle利用存储过程返回结果集开发报表细说ORA-08104错误相关资讯 Oracle索引 Oracle重建索引
- Oracle跳跃式索引扫描测试 (08月09日)
- Oracle组合索引与回表 (08/07/2015 18:11:53)
- Oracle 索引基本原理 (04/12/2015 18:03:58)
| - 关于Oracle位图索引内部浅论 (09/17/2015 19:23:59)
- Oracle 索引的可见与隐藏(visible (07/18/2015 09:41:42)
- Oracle索引合并coalesce操作 (04/01/2015 20:21:34)
|
本文评论 查看全部评论 (0)