Welcome 微信登录

首页 / 数据库 / MySQL / ORA-600 [2662] Block SCN is ahead of Current SCN [ID 28929.1]

Note: For additional ORA-600 related information please read Note:146580.1 PURPOSE:              This article discusses the internal error "ORA-600 [2662]", what   it means and possible actions. The information here is only applicable   to the versions listed and is provided only for guidance. ERROR:                ORA-600 [2662] [a] [b] [c] [d] [e] VERSIONS:  versions 6.0 to 10.1 DESCRIPTION:   A data block SCN is ahead of the current SCN.   The ORA-600 [2662] occurs when an SCN is compared to the dependent SCN   stored in a UGA variable.   If the SCN is less than the dependent SCN then we signal the ORA-600 [2662]  internal error. ARGUMENTS:  Arg [a]  Current SCN WRAP  Arg [b]  Current SCN BASE  Arg [c]  dependent SCN WRAP  Arg [d]  dependent SCN BASE   Arg [e]  Where present this is the DBA where the dependent SCN came from. FUNCTIONALITY:        File and IO buffer management for redo logs IMPACT:  INSTANCE FAILURE  POSSIBLE PHYSICAL CORRUPTION SUGGESTIONS:               There are different situations where ORA-600 [2662] can be raised.   It can be raised on startup or duing database operation.   If not using Parallel Server, check that 2 instances have not mounted  the same database.   Check for SMON traces and have the alert.log and trace files ready  to send to support.   Check the SCN difference [argument d]-[argument b].   If the SCNs in the error are very close, then try to shutdown and startup  the instance several times.    In some situations, the SCN increment during startup may permit the   database to open. Keep track of the number of times you attempted a   startup.   If the Known Issues section below does not help in terms of identifying  a solution, please submit the trace files and alert.log to Oracle  Support Services for further analysis.   Known Issues:   Bug# 5889016   See Note:5889016.8      Corruption / OERI during recovery      Fixed:    Bug# 4453449   See Note:4453449.8      OERI:3020 / corruption errors from multiple FLASHBACK DATABASE      Fixed: 10.2.0.2, 11.1.0.6   Bug# 2899477   See Note:2899477.8      Minimise risk of a false OERI[2662]      Fixed: 9.2.0.5, 10.1.0.2   Bug# 2764106   See Note:2764106.8      False OERI[2662] possible on SELECT which can crash the instance      Fixed: 9.2.0.5, 10.1.0.2   Bug# 2216823   See Note:2216823.8      OERI [2662] reusing a TEMPFILE with a restored database      Fixed: 10.1.0.2   Bug# 2054025   See Note:2054025.8      OERI:2662 possible on new TEMPORARY index block      Fixed: 9.0.1.3, 9.2.0.1   Bug# 851959   See Note:851959.8      OERI:2662 possible from distributed OPS select      Fixed: 7.3.4.5   Bug# 647927 P  See Note:647927.8      Digital Unix ONLY: OERI:2662 could occur under heavy load      Fixed: 8.0.4.2, 8.0.5.0      INTERNAL ONLY SECTION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION TO CUSTOMERS ======================================================================== There were 2 forms of this error until 7.2.3:  Type I:  4/5 argument forms -                               The SCN found on a block (dependent SCN) is ahead of the                                 current SCN. See below for this  Type II:        1 Argument (before 7.2.3 only):                 Oracle is in the process of writing a block to a log file.                 If the calculated block checksum is less than or equal to 1                 (0 and 1 are reserved) ORA-600 [2662] is returned.                 This is a problem generating an offline immediate log marker                 (kcrfwg).                 *NOT DOCUMENTED HERE*         Type I~~~~~~    a.  Current SCN WRAP    b.  Current SCN BASE    c.  dependent SCN WRAP    d.  dependent SCN BASE    e.  Where present this is the DBA where the dependent SCN came from.        From kcrf.h:         If the SCN comes from the recent or current SCN then a dba         of zero is saved. If it comes from undo$ because the undo segment is         not available then the undo segment number is saved, which looks like         a block from file 0. If the SCN is for a media recovery redo (i.e.         block number == 0 in change vector), then the dba is for block 0          of the relevant datafile. If it is from another database for a         distributed transaction then dba is DBAINF(). If it comes from a TX           lock then the dba is really usn<<16+slot. Type II~~~~~~~    a.  checksum -> log block checksum - zero if none (thread # in old format)   --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Diagnosis:~~~~~~~~~~        In addition to different basic types from above, there are different   situations where ORA-600 [2662] type I can be raised.  Getting started:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   (1) is the error raised during normal database operations (i.e. when the       database is up) or during startup of the database?   (2) what is the SCN difference [d]-[b] ( subtract argument "b" from arg "d")?   (3) is there a fifth argument [e] ?        If so convert the dba to file# block#        Is it a data dictionary object? (file#=1)       If so find out object name with the help of reference dictionary                from second database   (4) What is the current SQL statement? (see trace)       Which table is refered to?       Does the table match the object you found in previous step?    Be careful at this point: there may be no relationship between DBA in [e]    and the real source of problem (blockdump).  Deeper analysis:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  (1) investigate trace file:      this will be a user trace file normally but could be an smon trace too  (2) search for: "buffer"       ("buffer dba" in Oracle7 dumps, "buffer tsn" in Oracle8/Oracle9 dumps)      this will bring you to a blockdump which usually represents the       "real" source of OERI:2662       WARNING: There may be more than one buffer pinned to the process               so ensure you check out all pinned buffers.    -> does the blockdump match the dba from e.?   -> what kind of blockdump is it?                 (a) rollback segment header       (b) datablock       (c) other    Check list and possible causes~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   If Parallel Server check both nodes are using the same lock manager  instance & point at the same control files.   Possible causes:   (1) doing an open resetlogs with _ALLOW_RESETLOGS_CORRUPTION enabled      (2) a hardware problem, like a faulty controller, resulting in a failed       write to the control file or the redo logs       (3) restoring parts of the database from backup and not doing the       appropriate recovery       (4) restoring a control file and not doing a RECOVER DATABASE USING BACKUP       CONTROLFILE       (5) having _DISABLE_LOGGING set during crash recovery                        (6) problems with the DLM in a parallel server environment        (7) a bug         Solutions:    (1) if the SCNs in the error are very close, attempting a startup several        times will bump up the dscn every time we open the database even if        open fails. The database will open when dscn=scn.         (2)You can bump the SCN either on open or while the database is open       using <Event:ADJUST_SCN> (see Note:30681.1).      Be aware that you should rebuild the database if you use this      option.    Once this has occurred you would normally want to rebuild the   database via exp/rebuild/imp as there is no guarantee that some   other blocks are not ahead of time. Articles:~~~~~~~~~  Solutions:   Note:30681.1   Details of the ADJUST_SCN Event   Note:1070079.6 Alter System Checkpoint   Possible Causes:   Note:1021243.6 CHECK INIT.ORA SETTING _DISABLE_LOGGING   Note:41399.1   Forcing the database open with `_ALLOW_RESETLOGS_CORRUPTION`   Note:851959.9  OERI:2662 DURING CREATE SNAPSHOT AT MASTER SITE  Known Bugs:~~~~~~~~~~~ Fixed In. Bug No.      Description---------+------------+----------------------------------------------------7.1.5     BUG:2298737.1.3     Bug:195115   Miscalculation of SCN on startup for distributed TX ?7.1.6.2.7 Bug:297197   Port specific Solaris OPS problem7.3       Bug:336196   Port specific IBM SP AIX problem -> dlm issue    7.3.4.5   Bug:851959   OERI:2662 possible from distributed OPS selectNot fixed Bug:2216823  OERI:2662 reported when reusing tempfile with restored DB8.1.7.4   Bug:2177050  OERI:729 space leak possible (with tags "define var info"/"oactoid info")                       can corrupt UGA and cause OERI:2662 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ensure that this note comes out on top in Metalink when searchedora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-600 ora-6002662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 26622662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662 2662  </Internal_Only  
Related
Products
·         Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition ·         Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Personal Edition ·         Oracle Database Products > Oracle Database > Oracle Database > Oracle Server - Standard Edition Keywords
BUGTAG_ADDBUGS; INTTEAMREVIEWED; NOTDDRCONFIRMED
Errors
ORA-600[2662]
Current online Redo 和 Undo 损坏的处理方法Oracle DB 服务器 系统时间修改问题 与 SCN 关系的深入研究相关资讯      Oracle教程 
  • Oracle中纯数字的varchar2类型和  (07/29/2015 07:20:43)
  • Oracle教程:Oracle中查看DBLink密  (07/29/2015 07:16:55)
  • [Oracle] SQL*Loader 详细使用教程  (08/11/2013 21:30:36)
  • Oracle教程:Oracle中kill死锁进程  (07/29/2015 07:18:28)
  • Oracle教程:ORA-25153 临时表空间  (07/29/2015 07:13:37)
  • Oracle教程之管理安全和资源  (04/08/2013 11:39:32)
本文评论 查看全部评论 (0)
表情: 姓名: 字数